II. PROOF THAT GOD INSPIRED THE BIBLEGod Describes His Physical NatureIn most cases, whether it be in law, science, history or religion, it is necessary to have at least two witnesses that agree. On this site, there are two dissimilar proofs that the Bible is God’s message (one from Bible Numerics and the other from the Bible’s own history). On this page is the second proof that mirrors the numerics found in Exodus 34:6b-7. Revelation 1:8 is a New Testament verse describing God in words and numbers with features confirming those found in Exodus. These two verses are compared because they are unique. Nowhere else does God describe His character and physical nature so completely. Three Points To ConsiderThere are three points which should be considered before examining Revelation 1:8 for Bible numerics. 1. New Testament ScriptureIf the New Testament authors were questioned whether their writings should be considered scripture, it is unlikely any of them (with the possible exception of the Apostle John for the book of Revelation) would have equated their work with that of the Hebrew Old Testament. Only the Gospels contain the words of Jesus, and only Revelation came by a vision. The bulk of the New Testament does not follow the Old Testament pattern of, “God said...”, “God did...”, or “God sent...” The New Testament is quite different from the Old Testament. It was “canonized” as scripture centuries after its individual books were written. This one point raises the legitimate question whether numeric features can be found in the New Testament. And if they exist, do they have to equal those found in the Old Testament? 2. Differing ManuscriptsUnlike the Hebrew Old Testament, where there is only one major manuscript (the Masorite Text), in the New Testament there are several Greek versions. The two most important versions are the Textus Receptus (the “Received Text”), and one simply called the Greek New Testament.
The TR was copied, recopied and handed down through the centuries. The original manuscript is no longer in existence. The GNT was compiled from older manuscripts not previously available. Many of these documents were discovered only in the 1850s. This article will not debate which version (TR or GNT) is better, or go further into their history. It is enough for the reader to know there are differences in the Greek text. Some of these differences can be seen in the two versions of Revelation 1:8 presented below. (Although the text is different, the meaning is the same.)
Unlike the Exodus verse, neither version has a sum total divisible by 7. The GNT has 21 words, but the number of letters is not divisible by 7. Which version is to be used for Bible numerics? Is one correct, and the other incorrect? Could they be both correct or are they both incorrect? 3. Greek NumericsIvan Panin’s Greek numerics are not the same as the Hebrew numerics. The values for 6 and 90 were omitted. One of these (the sixth letter) was “Digamma”. It was a letter that fell out of use. In essence, Panin accounted for the value in his chart even though it did not appear in the New Testament. The same may have occurred with the 18th letter (valued 90).
From these three points, it would seem unlikely for the numerics in the New Testament to be exactly like numerics in the Old Testament. Even though Revelation 1:8 is closely tied in with Exodus 34:6b-7, the numeric features may not be as numerous, obvious or clear. Adjusting The NumbersVery few numeric features appear in Revelation 1:8. The ones that do appear seem unrelated to the Exodus verse. The relationship remains hidden because one major point has not been accounted for. Greek is not Hebrew. A minor adjustment to the numerics associated with the Greek is necessary. The clue lies in the assigning of values to each letter. In the Hebrew, different values are assigned to each of the 22 letters in sequence: 1 to 10, then in groups of ten from 20 to 100, and finally in groups of hundreds from 200 to 400. In the Greek, two values in the “pattern” are missing: 6 and 90. The figure below shows this adjustment of Ivan Panin’s numerics to follow the Hebrew pattern with no omissions. (The final letter “Omega” now has a value of 600, rather than 800.)
When these numeric changes are applied to Revelation 1:8, the relationship to Exodus 34:6b-7 quickly appears. Click for the full GNT numeric conversion. Revelation Confirms ExodusThe following table lists the main features of the Exodus verse. The same techniques are applied to both versions of Revelation to show the similarity. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ConclusionThe GNT has a closer match to Exodus’ mathematical features than the TR. Out of fourteen different features, the GNT matches Exodus six times. Seven times it has a parallel feature, and once it has an extra related feature. Only once does the GNT not match Exodus at all. The TR matches Exodus only four times. Six times it has a parallel feature, and four times it does not match Exodus. Given the problems mentioned above (the change from Hebrew to Greek, the question of scripture, and the difference in numerics), it was expected that the features in Revelation 1:8 might be fewer in number, different, or not as obvious. This expectation was borne out. The features are not as consistent as in the Hebrew, but it is amazing how both Greek versions still maintain so many numeric features related to Exodus. This can only be due to God’s influence. Revelation 1:8 is the second witness (proof) that the whole Bible (i.e. the Old Testament and the New Testament) is God’s message. The New Testament may not be like the Old Testament, but it is the continuation and fulfillment of the old covenant. The testimony of Jesus (i.e. the New Testament) is the spirit of prophecy (Revelation 19:10).
Notes: 1, 2 Bibleworks 3.2, Hermeneutika, Big Fork, Montana, 1995 Copyright© 2002 by Jerry Chin |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||